Look, I tried: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
In our crazy, inter-connected world, much financial markets activity comprises of fattened [[Intermediary|intermediaries]] sitting cross-legged in a circle, passing around  a parcel belonging, at some remove, to the [[ultimate client]]. As it passes by, each one takes a nibble at it.  
In our crazy, inter-connected world, much financial markets activity comprises of fattened [[Intermediary|intermediaries]] sitting cross-legged in a circle, passing around  a parcel belonging, at some remove, to the [[ultimate client]]. As it passes by, each one takes a nibble at it.  


The [[ultimate client]] himself is probably some benign, well-meaning, atavistic pensioner with few expectations beyond seeing out his autumnal years dandling a grand-daughter on his knee, watching her blow dandelion fronds around a meadow bathed in golden light. To this unitary goal his extra pennies have all gone into a pension plan managed by an asset manager, who has outsourced its trading function to a trading desk, who is hedging the actuarial delta with a fund of hedge-funds, which in turn invests in a diversified portfolio and hedge hunds, who
Now each of these intermediaries need to agree the terms on which the parcel passes. Their main concern is that they get enough of a handle on the asset for long enough to have a good bite before they pass it on, but each needs also to prepare for the consequences of the parcel not, eventually coming back to them when their immediate client — in most cases the person who passed the parcel to them — decides to ask for it back.
 
Now the intermediaries need to agree the terms on which the parcel passes. Their main concern is that they get enough of a handle on the asset for long enough to have a good bite before they pass it on, but each needs also to prepare for the consequences of the parcel not, eventually coming back to them when their immediate client — in most cases the person who passed the parcel to them — decides to ask for it back.


{{sa}}
{{sa}}

Revision as of 17:04, 19 November 2019


“When worlds collide”™
Template:Anatnavigation-besci

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

From our “understanding the implications of behavioural science for contract negotiation” series — it is a short series at present — comes this oft-overlooked motivation for your counterparty’s apparently absurd negotiation demands: not to be able to enforce them, per se, but to persuade its own, absurdly demanding clients, that it tried.

In our crazy, inter-connected world, much financial markets activity comprises of fattened intermediaries sitting cross-legged in a circle, passing around a parcel belonging, at some remove, to the ultimate client. As it passes by, each one takes a nibble at it.

Now each of these intermediaries need to agree the terms on which the parcel passes. Their main concern is that they get enough of a handle on the asset for long enough to have a good bite before they pass it on, but each needs also to prepare for the consequences of the parcel not, eventually coming back to them when their immediate client — in most cases the person who passed the parcel to them — decides to ask for it back.

See also

Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Look,_I_tried&oldid=34608"