Machines are fungible: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|devil|
{{a|devil|
[[File:Marvin.png|450px|thumb|center|Planned obsolescence, yesterday.]]
[[File:Marvin.png|450px|thumb|center|Planned obsolescence, yesterday.]]
}}[[Machines are fungible]]: you can engineer the same machine and get the same results anywhere in the world. The difference in operating cost between the same piece of machinery here and there — essentially the difference in real estate and energy inputs — is an opportunity for [[arbitrage]].<Ref>Though it might be blown out by transport costs and material qualities, not to mention variability in the [[meatware]].</ref> Machines ''are'' totally fungible. The [[meatware]] which operates it is ''not''. To be sure one can ''generalise'' about people — it is [[Unconscious bias|hard not to]] — these are [[heuristic]]s — rules of thumb, top be used provisionally and in the absence of better intelligence — and if we treat them as immutable rules on which we may rely we are asking for trouble.
}}[[Machines are fungible]]: you can engineer the same machine and get the same results anywhere in the world. The difference in operating cost between the same piece of machinery here and there — essentially the difference in real estate and energy inputs — is an opportunity for [[arbitrage]].<Ref>Though it might be blown out by transport costs and material qualities, not to mention variability in the [[meatware]].</ref> Machines ''are'' totally [[fungible]]. The [[meatware]] which operates it is ''not''. To be sure one can ''generalise'' about people — it is [[Unconscious bias|hard not to]] — these are [[heuristic]]s — rules of thumb, to be used provisionally and in the absence of better intelligence — and if we treat them as immutable rules on which we may rely we are asking for trouble.
{{Sa}}
{{Sa}}
*[[W. Edwards Deming]]
*[[W. Edwards Deming]]

Latest revision as of 12:07, 22 February 2021

Planned obsolescence, yesterday.


In which the curmudgeonly old sod puts the world to rights.
Index — Click ᐅ to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Machines are fungible: you can engineer the same machine and get the same results anywhere in the world. The difference in operating cost between the same piece of machinery here and there — essentially the difference in real estate and energy inputs — is an opportunity for arbitrage.[1] Machines are totally fungible. The meatware which operates it is not. To be sure one can generalise about people — it is hard not to — these are heuristics — rules of thumb, to be used provisionally and in the absence of better intelligence — and if we treat them as immutable rules on which we may rely we are asking for trouble.

See also

References

  1. Though it might be blown out by transport costs and material qualities, not to mention variability in the meatware.