Magic circle law firm: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (28 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{g}} | {{a|g| | ||
{{image|Magic Circle Lawyers|png|Look into my eyes. £1,250 is a sensible [[charge-out rate]] for a [[trainee]] {{vsr|1896}}}} | |||
}}{{dpn|/ˈmæʤɪk ˈsɜːkl lɔː fɜːm/<br>(Also (''chiefly Seppo'') “[[white-shoe law firm|white-shoe ~]]” ; “[[big law]]”)|n|}} | |||
Known in the commonwealth as the “[[magic circle]]”, and in the new world as “[[big law]]”, these large multinational legal service organisations issue curiously [[Bright-line test|non-committal]] [[legal opinion]]s and fulfil an essential but hard-to-articulate role in vouchsafing the orderly operation of the world’s financial markets. As such, they are one of the few international enterprises whose business model was wholly unaffected by the global financial crisis. | |||
===Magick circle and the occult=== | |||
As the reference to [[Magick circle|magick]] suggests, there is something of the occult in these organisations: | |||
*'''Nocturnal''': [[Private practice lawyer|Magic circle lawyer]]s are basically vampiric and, by day, repose in crates of salted earth in crypts beneath their offices. This can lead to disappointment, particularly among the sunshine-loving trading folk, who naively expect a draft promised “today” to arrive during the hours of daylight, and not to the accompaniment of moonlit dire-wolves at four o’clock the following morning. | |||
*'''Undead''': For the same reason it is literally impossible to work private practice lawyers to death, because they are already undead. As long as you like your work late and impenetrable, they will carry on dancing as long as you are prepared to keep paying for the children of the night to make their music. | |||
*'''Soul selling''': There is something Faustian about the bargains one strikes with magic circle law firms. Young clerks sell their souls in return for knowledge, power and unlimited wealth (though the trade is reversed from that proposed by Goethe: here it is soul and damnation first, wealth and power later). | |||
*'''Spiritual possession''': Whole [[investment bank]] [[legal department]]s have been known to fall under the mendacious swoon of a single firm. In some cases even repeated efforts by a specially trained [[chief operating officer|exorcist]] to cast out these malign influences over a possessed [[general counsel]] have foundered. | |||
===Gravity-defying [[charge-out rate]]s=== | |||
Magic-circle [[charge-out rates]] have been steadily rising since 1985, to the point where it is now more expensive to hire a [[trainee solicitor]] for an hour than to fly to Monaco for a weekend at the ''Grand Prix''. | |||
The best way of doing that, therefore, is to arrange for a [[magic circle law firm]] to invite you to the motor racing as part of its client entertainment programme. | The best way of doing that, therefore, is to arrange for a [[magic circle law firm]] to invite you to the motor racing as part of its client entertainment programme. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 21: | ||
For their part, magic circle law firms are known to despair at the arms-race amongst them for client corporate entertainment, which has got to the point where they have had to jack up trainee charge out rates — | For their part, magic circle law firms are known to despair at the arms-race amongst them for client corporate entertainment, which has got to the point where they have had to jack up trainee charge out rates — | ||
The rate of increase in [[charge-out rates]] has been so steady as to draw comparisons with the performance of Fairfield Sentry’s investment in Madoff. No-one tell Harry Markopolos. | The rate of increase in [[charge-out rates]] and, yea, even law firm revenues, has been so steady as to draw comparisons with the performance of Fairfield Sentry’s investment in [[Madoff|Madoff Securities]]. No-one tell Harry Markopolos. | ||
But it is not just the steady increase in [[charge-out rates]] which has the feel of a conjuring trick about it | But it is not just the steady increase in [[charge-out rates]] which has the feel of a conjuring trick about it. | ||
=== Responsibility be gone === | |||
The Magic Circle’s showpiece is surely how it can make personal responsibility disappear without a trace, simply by waving a [[legal opinion]] at it. The lion’s share of the economic interactions that precipitated the dot-com bust, the Russian crisis, [[Enron]]’s collapse, the credit crunch, [[Bernard Madoff]]’s gargantuan fraud, the [[global financial crisis]], the London Whale, WireCard, 1MDB —all of these will have been done under the watchful eye and diligent documentary assistance of law firms, not one of which has sustained so much as a claim on its professional indemnity insurance policy as far as has been widely reported. | |||
Now it is no part of the [[JC]]’s intention to suggest complicity, neglect or even carelessness on the part of these law firms — they are peopled by tireless, astute and upright people, to be sure — but it ''is'' to wonder about [[Causation|cause]] and [[Correlation|effect]]. | |||
For, if every phase of [[Lehman]]’s overreach and eventual collapse can have been accompanied by expensively rendered, diligently composed and conscientiously delivered [[legal advice]], and no part of that advice can be faulted, its recipients might pause to wonder what ''good'' it did — and, for that matter, ''does'', even when provided to firms which are ''not'' in present danger of imploding. | |||
The goods it does, of course, is not to the company’s bottom line, but the bottoms of its responsible risk managers employed by its [[client]]s. No-one got fired for hiring [[Linklaters]], much less for relying on its legal advice, after all. | |||
Fun fact: the total revenue of the top twenty global law firms in 2019<ref>You can assemble this, rather painstakingly, from the free section of [http://www.law.com law.com].</ref> was over ''thirty billion dollars''. | |||
Now that ''is'' a nice trick. | |||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Agency problem]] | |||
*[[Reliance on legal advice]] | |||
*[[Charge-out rate]]s | |||
*[[Allen & Overy]] | *[[Allen & Overy]] | ||
*[[Clifford Chance]] | *[[Clifford Chance]] | ||
*[[Freshfields]] | *[[Freshfields]] | ||
*[[Linklaters]] | *[[Linklaters]] | ||
*[[ | *[[Silver circle law firm]] | ||
{{ref}} | |||
{{ | |||
Latest revision as of 12:59, 19 December 2023
|
|
Magic circle law firm
/ˈmæʤɪk ˈsɜːkl lɔː fɜːm/
(Also (chiefly Seppo) “white-shoe ~” ; “big law”) (n.)
Known in the commonwealth as the “magic circle”, and in the new world as “big law”, these large multinational legal service organisations issue curiously non-committal legal opinions and fulfil an essential but hard-to-articulate role in vouchsafing the orderly operation of the world’s financial markets. As such, they are one of the few international enterprises whose business model was wholly unaffected by the global financial crisis.
Magick circle and the occult
As the reference to magick suggests, there is something of the occult in these organisations:
- Nocturnal: Magic circle lawyers are basically vampiric and, by day, repose in crates of salted earth in crypts beneath their offices. This can lead to disappointment, particularly among the sunshine-loving trading folk, who naively expect a draft promised “today” to arrive during the hours of daylight, and not to the accompaniment of moonlit dire-wolves at four o’clock the following morning.
- Undead: For the same reason it is literally impossible to work private practice lawyers to death, because they are already undead. As long as you like your work late and impenetrable, they will carry on dancing as long as you are prepared to keep paying for the children of the night to make their music.
- Soul selling: There is something Faustian about the bargains one strikes with magic circle law firms. Young clerks sell their souls in return for knowledge, power and unlimited wealth (though the trade is reversed from that proposed by Goethe: here it is soul and damnation first, wealth and power later).
- Spiritual possession: Whole investment bank legal departments have been known to fall under the mendacious swoon of a single firm. In some cases even repeated efforts by a specially trained exorcist to cast out these malign influences over a possessed general counsel have foundered.
Gravity-defying charge-out rates
Magic-circle charge-out rates have been steadily rising since 1985, to the point where it is now more expensive to hire a trainee solicitor for an hour than to fly to Monaco for a weekend at the Grand Prix.
The best way of doing that, therefore, is to arrange for a magic circle law firm to invite you to the motor racing as part of its client entertainment programme.
For their part, magic circle law firms are known to despair at the arms-race amongst them for client corporate entertainment, which has got to the point where they have had to jack up trainee charge out rates —
The rate of increase in charge-out rates and, yea, even law firm revenues, has been so steady as to draw comparisons with the performance of Fairfield Sentry’s investment in Madoff Securities. No-one tell Harry Markopolos.
But it is not just the steady increase in charge-out rates which has the feel of a conjuring trick about it.
Responsibility be gone
The Magic Circle’s showpiece is surely how it can make personal responsibility disappear without a trace, simply by waving a legal opinion at it. The lion’s share of the economic interactions that precipitated the dot-com bust, the Russian crisis, Enron’s collapse, the credit crunch, Bernard Madoff’s gargantuan fraud, the global financial crisis, the London Whale, WireCard, 1MDB —all of these will have been done under the watchful eye and diligent documentary assistance of law firms, not one of which has sustained so much as a claim on its professional indemnity insurance policy as far as has been widely reported.
Now it is no part of the JC’s intention to suggest complicity, neglect or even carelessness on the part of these law firms — they are peopled by tireless, astute and upright people, to be sure — but it is to wonder about cause and effect.
For, if every phase of Lehman’s overreach and eventual collapse can have been accompanied by expensively rendered, diligently composed and conscientiously delivered legal advice, and no part of that advice can be faulted, its recipients might pause to wonder what good it did — and, for that matter, does, even when provided to firms which are not in present danger of imploding.
The goods it does, of course, is not to the company’s bottom line, but the bottoms of its responsible risk managers employed by its clients. No-one got fired for hiring Linklaters, much less for relying on its legal advice, after all.
Fun fact: the total revenue of the top twenty global law firms in 2019[1] was over thirty billion dollars.
Now that is a nice trick.
See also
- Agency problem
- Reliance on legal advice
- Charge-out rates
- Allen & Overy
- Clifford Chance
- Freshfields
- Linklaters
- Silver circle law firm