No oral amendment: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
No longer, as it ought to be, an entirely vacuous piece of legal flannel — courtesy of an entirely vacuous piece of legal reasoning by no less an eminence than Lord Sumption of the Supreme Court in {{Casenote|Rock Advertising Limited|MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited}}. | No longer, as it ought to be, an entirely vacuous piece of legal flannel — courtesy of an entirely vacuous piece of legal reasoning by no less an eminence than Lord Sumption of the Supreme Court in {{Casenote|Rock Advertising Limited|MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited}}. | ||
{{ | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Amendment]] | *[[Amendment]] | ||
*{{Casenote|Rock Advertising Limited|MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited}} | *{{Casenote|Rock Advertising Limited|MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited}} | ||
Revision as of 11:36, 18 January 2020
|
Negotiation Anatomy™
|
“No oral modification” is a self-contradictory stricture on an amendment agreement, until 2018 understood by all to be silly fluff put in a contract to appease the lawyers.
No longer, as it ought to be, an entirely vacuous piece of legal flannel — courtesy of an entirely vacuous piece of legal reasoning by no less an eminence than Lord Sumption of the Supreme Court in Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited.