Nominalisation: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tag|Nominalisation}} is, itself, a nominalisation of the verb to "nominalise". Goedel would be pleased.
{{tag|Nominalisation}} itself, a nominalisation of the verb to "nominalise"<ref>[[Goedel]] would be pleased.</ref> is the act, as adored by [[mediocre lawyer|solicitors]] as it is loathed by anyone who cares for the English language, of gutting a precise {{tag|verb}}, by converting it into a {{tag|noun}} and jamming a general {{tag|verb}} in front of it.  
 
{{plain|[[have visibility of]]|see}}
{{plain|issue a notification to|tell}}
{{plain|have a discussion about|discuss}}
{{plain|we are supportive of|we support}}
{{plain|have the appearance of being|seem}}<br />
 
[[Nominalisation]] is the act, as adored by [[mediocre lawyer|solicitors]] as it is loathed by anyone who cares for the English language, of gutting a precise {{tag|verb}}, by converting it into a {{tag|noun}} and jamming a general {{tag|verb}} in front of it.  


Or should I say:
Or should I say:
Line 23: Line 15:
Not that there’s anything wrong with cross-dressing, mind.
Not that there’s anything wrong with cross-dressing, mind.


===Examples===
{{plain|[[have visibility of]]|see}}
{{plain|issue a notification to|tell}}
{{plain|have a discussion about|discuss}}
{{plain|we are supportive of|we support}}
{{plain|have the appearance of being|seem}}<br />
{{seealso}}
{{seealso}}
*[[Adjectivisation]]
*[[Adjectivisation]]

Revision as of 09:47, 14 December 2018

Nominalisation — itself, a nominalisation of the verb to "nominalise"[1] — is the act, as adored by solicitors as it is loathed by anyone who cares for the English language, of gutting a precise verb, by converting it into a noun and jamming a general verb in front of it.

Or should I say:

Nominalisation is the act, which induces adoration in solicitors as much as it effects a sensation of loathing in anyone having a fondness for the English language, of ensuring the evisceration of a precise verb by effecting its conversion into a noun (or adjective) and ensuring the jammery of a general verb in front of it.

Dead give aways:

Effecting a nominalisation: grammatical cross-dressing

The worst kind of nominalisation goes a step further: not only must the poor verb dress up as a noun; an equally unsuspecting noun must behave like a verb. “Effect” is this kind of nominalisation.

Not that there’s anything wrong with cross-dressing, mind.

Examples

Why sayhave visibility ofwhen you mean “see”?
Why say “issue a notification to” when you mean “tell”?
Why say “have a discussion about” when you mean “discuss”?
Why say “we are supportive of” when you mean “we support”?
Why say “have the appearance of being” when you mean “seem”?

See also

  1. Goedel would be pleased.