Non-contractual obligation: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:20, 11 March 2019

Negotiation Anatomy™

Walk-away \| Escalation \| Algorithm \| Heuristic \| subject matter expert \| Operationalisation \| Playbook \| Smart contract \| Dead horse \| Knife fight \| 7 wastes \| Cruddy legal advice Index: Click ᐅ to expand: Negotiation Negotiation hacks Contract

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you. Sign up for our newsletter.

Of relevance to (a the terminally pedantic and (ii) those terminally pedantic folk whose handmaiden is the Rome II convention on governing law.

“Non-contractual obligations” includes claims based on tort (such as negligence), breach of competition law and breach of statutory duty which may nonetheless arise out of a contract without amounting to a breach of it.

Revision as of 09:55, 28 December 2018 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:20, 11 March 2019 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Of relevance to the [[Rome II]] convention on [[governing law]], “[[~~non~~-contractual obligations]]” includes claims based on [[tort]] (such as [[negligence]]), breach of [[competition law]] and breach of [[statutory duty]].		{{a\|negotiation\|}}Of relevance to (a the terminally pedantic and (ii) those terminally pedantic folk whose handmaiden is the [[Rome II]] convention on [[governing law]].

			“[[Non-contractual obligations]]” includes claims based on [[tort]] (such as [[negligence]]), breach of [[competition law]] and breach of [[statutory duty]] which may nonetheless arise out of a [[contract]] without amounting to a breach of it.