Non-contractual obligation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|negotiation|}} | {{a|negotiation|}}From the “shoot me now” file, the idea of a non-contractual obligaiton is relevant to: | ||
:(a) the [[terminally pedantic]] and | |||
(b) those splendid, if [[terminally pedantic]], folk whose handmaiden is the [[Rome II]] convention on [[governing law]]. | |||
“[[Non-contractual obligations]]” includes claims based on [[tort]] (such as [[negligence]]), breach of [[competition law]] and breach of [[statutory duty]] which may nonetheless arise out of a [[contract]] without amounting to a breach of it. | “[[Non-contractual obligations]]” includes claims based on [[tort]] (such as [[negligence]]), breach of [[competition law]] and breach of [[statutory duty]] which may nonetheless arise out of a [[contract]] without amounting to a breach of it. As you can imagine, this happens a lot in the context of financial markets transactions.<ref>It doesn’t.</ref> | ||
{{ | |||
{{sa}} | |||
*[[Rome II]] | *[[Rome II]] | ||
*[[Governing law]] | *[[Governing law]] | ||
*[[Non-exclusive jurisdiction]] | *[[Non-exclusive jurisdiction]] | ||
Revision as of 20:56, 19 November 2020
|
Negotiation Anatomy™
|
From the “shoot me now” file, the idea of a non-contractual obligaiton is relevant to:
- (a) the terminally pedantic and
(b) those splendid, if terminally pedantic, folk whose handmaiden is the Rome II convention on governing law.
“Non-contractual obligations” includes claims based on tort (such as negligence), breach of competition law and breach of statutory duty which may nonetheless arise out of a contract without amounting to a breach of it. As you can imagine, this happens a lot in the context of financial markets transactions.[1]
See also
- ↑ It doesn’t.