Paradigm failure
|
|
Something one should understand about power structures and other paradigms is that they collapse not because they are degenerating, but because a better power structure has become available. This is where the theoretical appeal of Karl Popper’s Falsificationism hit the buffers of real-life behavioral psychology, and why Thomas Kuhn’s account of scientific revolutions is more nuanced.
So, those who would cast a poor political leader out, first find a robust and plausible alternative — ideally a group — that can shift the axis of the debate and provide a preferable alternative (it is not about doing a better job, but re-framing the debate altogether).
On the other hand, as a defensive strategy incumbents should surround themselves with people who can exercise on the plan but do not have the gumption or charisma to re-frame the narrative, and who cannot therefore present a plausible alternative.
Politicians who have successfully re-framed the narrative to suit themselves (for better or worse): Margaret Thatcher. Tony Blair and Gordon Brown; Donald Trump.
Employers: remember, the reason employees stay is the same reason: because no-one has made a better offer.