Passive subjunctive perfect progressive: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "The kind of construction one would want if one were to have had been being used as a pawn in a game of NINJA LEGAL DRAFTING. {{sa}} *Plain English {{plainenglish}}")
 
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The kind of construction one would want if one were to have had been being used as a pawn in a game of NINJA LEGAL DRAFTING.
{{a|plainenglish|[[File:Knee-slide.jpg|450px|center|Well, I think this calls for a knee-slide, don’t you?]]}}A [[passive subjunctive perfect progressive]] is the kind of grammatical construction one would want if one were to have had been being used as a pawn in a game of [[ISDA ninja|ninja]] [[Legal|legal]] drafting.
 
The definition of “passive progressive”: someone who says:
{{quote|“If that construction were to have had been being used as a [[passive subjunctive perfect progressive]], would you hold it against me? That is to say, would it have had been being held against me by you?”}}
 


{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Plain English]]
*[[Plain English]]
{{plainenglish}}
*[[Subjunctive]]
{{egg}}

Latest revision as of 14:04, 30 August 2022

Towards more picturesque speech
Well, I think this calls for a knee-slide, don’t you?

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

A passive subjunctive perfect progressive is the kind of grammatical construction one would want if one were to have had been being used as a pawn in a game of ninja legal drafting.

The definition of “passive progressive”: someone who says:

“If that construction were to have had been being used as a passive subjunctive perfect progressive, would you hold it against me? That is to say, would it have had been being held against me by you?”


See also