Perfection: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
{{d|Perfection|/pəˈfɛkʃən/|n|}}
{{d|Perfection|/pəˈfɛkʃən/|n|}}


1.  ''In the lore of security-taking'': The juridical art of making a [[security interest]] “work” - in legal circles, often a {{tag|security interest}} like a {{t|fixed charge}}, perfect: tickety-boo, compliant with all [[formalities]] and enforceable in a court of your choosing. This might be registration of a charge at companies house, notification to the chargor, standing on one leg at the crest of [[Kilimanjaro]] and gravely reciting a Rudyard Kipling poem. [[Magic words]], [[horcrux]]es and amulets that make the mystical, semi-divine, state of [[suretyship]] ''hum''. Sadly, the [[Financial Collateral Directive]] has taken much of the fun out of this, by rendering it basically unnecessary: if i charge counts as a “[[financial collateral arrangement]]”, the formal registration and perfection requirements which would otherwise apply (eg notification; registering the [[security interest]] with the registrar of companies, the hilarious pantomime of the [[Slavenburg]] filing) do not apply.
1.  ''In the lore of security-taking'': The juridical art of making a [[security interest]] “work”. Formal security interests — things like charges, debentures, mortgages and pledges — live in a kind of purgatorial mid-sphere between the human and the divine, and this means their earthly form, to have any causal effect, must be “perfect”: tickety-boo, compliant with all local legal [[formalities]] so that when things in the material realm have gone ''[[seins en l’air]]'' and the poor terrestrial securityholder looks beyond the surly horizon and prays aid of the estimable gods of enforcement, things actually work as billed. What counts as perfection is, literally, a lore unto itself, and dependong on the jurisdiction in which you are seekeing celestial aid might be simple registration, within a prescribed deadline, of your interest at companies registry, notification to the chargor, a sacred incantation, or standing on one leg at the crest of [[Kilimanjaro]] gravely reciting a Rudyard Kipling poem. Who knows? [[Fear]] of what may come from neglecting, or jsust not knowing, the necessary [[magic words]], [[horcrux]]es and amulets that will vouchsafe one’s semi-divine state of [[suretyship]] keep many a legal eagle  business. But as a people, we have lost our passion for the ineffable. A few years ago, those dour [[Reductionist|rationalists]] from the [[European Union]] enacted the [[Financial Collateral Directive]], which has taken much of the fun, and terror, out of security creation by rendering it basically unnecessary: if a [[security interest]] counts as a “[[financial collateral arrangement]]”, the formal registration and perfection requirements which would otherwise apply (eg notification; registering the [[security interest]] with the registrar of companies, the hilarious pantomime of the [[Slavenburg]] filings) are not required. ''Enlightenment Now'', friends.  


2. ''When trying to get something done''. That thing that [[Voltaire's maxim|Voltaire]] said was “[[Perfection is the enemy of good enough|the enemy of good enough]]”.
2. ''When trying to get something done''. That thing that [[Voltaire's maxim|Voltaire]] said was “[[Perfection is the enemy of good enough|the enemy of good enough]]”.

Revision as of 14:52, 16 September 2021

A word about credit risk mitigation


Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Perfection
/pəˈfɛkʃən/ (n.)

1. In the lore of security-taking: The juridical art of making a security interest “work”. Formal security interests — things like charges, debentures, mortgages and pledges — live in a kind of purgatorial mid-sphere between the human and the divine, and this means their earthly form, to have any causal effect, must be “perfect”: tickety-boo, compliant with all local legal formalities so that when things in the material realm have gone seins en l’air and the poor terrestrial securityholder looks beyond the surly horizon and prays aid of the estimable gods of enforcement, things actually work as billed. What counts as perfection is, literally, a lore unto itself, and dependong on the jurisdiction in which you are seekeing celestial aid might be simple registration, within a prescribed deadline, of your interest at companies registry, notification to the chargor, a sacred incantation, or standing on one leg at the crest of Kilimanjaro gravely reciting a Rudyard Kipling poem. Who knows? Fear of what may come from neglecting, or jsust not knowing, the necessary magic words, horcruxes and amulets that will vouchsafe one’s semi-divine state of suretyship keep many a legal eagle business. But as a people, we have lost our passion for the ineffable. A few years ago, those dour rationalists from the European Union enacted the Financial Collateral Directive, which has taken much of the fun, and terror, out of security creation by rendering it basically unnecessary: if a security interest counts as a “financial collateral arrangement”, the formal registration and perfection requirements which would otherwise apply (eg notification; registering the security interest with the registrar of companies, the hilarious pantomime of the Slavenburg filings) are not required. Enlightenment Now, friends.

2. When trying to get something done. That thing that Voltaire said was “the enemy of good enough”.

See also