Performative governance

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 12:08, 27 February 2021 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


In which the curmudgeonly old sod puts the world to rights.
Index — Click ᐅ to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

I define performative governance as the state’s theatrical deployment of visual, verbal, and gestural symbols to foster an impression of good governance before an audience of citizens

—Iza Ding[1]

Just as well this kind of thing could never happen in a corporate environment.

“Performative” is a voguish word, and if the learned author thinks she’s discovered something new — that administrators manage second-order derivatives and proxies of their political problems rather than engaging in the political problems themselves, she would do herself a favour by reading James C. Scott or Jane Jacobs — these ideas have been around for seventy or more years — but since its fashionable, and since it is bang-on the money, let”s go with it.

See also

References

  1. World Politics, Vol 72, Issue 4, October 2020, pp. 525 - 556. “Performative governance should be distinguished from other types of state behavior, such as inertia, paternalism, and the substantive satisfaction of citizens’ demands.”