Scale as leverage: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|devil|}}{{quote|Zillow executives looked at this state of affairs and said, “well, this state of affairs is bad, we need to grow our market share and make our algorithms more accurate. We are looking to be a first-choice market maker in home-selling, and we can’t do that if our prices are too low”. So they tweaked the algorithms to generate higher prices. Those prices also turned out not to be particularly accurate, but in the other direction. If you systematically bid too low, you will not do many trades, but you will make a lot of money on each trade. If you systematically bid too high, you will lose money on each trade, and also you will do a whole ton of trades. This is much worse.
{{a|devil|}}{{quote|Zillow executives looked at this state of affairs and said, “well, this state of affairs is bad, we need to grow our market share and make our algorithms more accurate. We are looking to be a first-choice market maker in home-selling, and we can’t do that if our prices are too low”. So they tweaked the algorithms to generate higher prices. Those prices also turned out not to be particularly accurate, but in the other direction. If you systematically bid too low, you will not do many trades, but you will make a lot of money on each trade. If you systematically bid too high, you will lose money on each trade, and also you will do a whole ton of trades. This is much worse.
:—Matt Levine, ''MoneyStuff'', Bloomberg, 18 November 2021}}
:—Matt Levine, ''MoneyStuff'', Bloomberg, 18 November 2021}}
{{sa}}
*[[Scale]]
*[[Leverage]]

Latest revision as of 10:30, 24 November 2021


In which the curmudgeonly old sod puts the world to rights.
Index — Click ᐅ to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Zillow executives looked at this state of affairs and said, “well, this state of affairs is bad, we need to grow our market share and make our algorithms more accurate. We are looking to be a first-choice market maker in home-selling, and we can’t do that if our prices are too low”. So they tweaked the algorithms to generate higher prices. Those prices also turned out not to be particularly accurate, but in the other direction. If you systematically bid too low, you will not do many trades, but you will make a lot of money on each trade. If you systematically bid too high, you will lose money on each trade, and also you will do a whole ton of trades. This is much worse.

—Matt Levine, MoneyStuff, Bloomberg, 18 November 2021

See also