Single agreement: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Removed redirect to Interpretation - ISDA Provision)
Tags: Removed redirect Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|myth|}}In the [[Iron Mountain]], in the internal fires of [[Bretton Woods]] an alliance of the [[First Men]] and the [[Children of the Forest]] forged the [[Single Agreement]]: this would be the one agreement to rule them all, one agreement to margin them, one agreement to bind them in accordance with their terms, and in the darkness of insolvency net them.  
{{a|myth|}}In the [[Iron Mountain]], in the internal fires of [[Bretton Woods]] an alliance of the [[First Men]] and the [[Children of the Forest]] forged the [[Single Agreement]]: this would be the one agreement to rule them all, one agreement to margin them, one agreement to bind them in accordance with their terms, and in their [[insolvency|darkness]] [[net]] them.  


{{Sa}}
{{Sa}}
*[[Children of the Forest]]
*[[Children of the Forest]]
*[[First Men]]
*[[First Men]]
*[[Iron Mountain]]

Revision as of 17:20, 8 June 2021

Myths and legends of the market
The JC’s guide to the foundational mythology of the markets.™


Index: Click to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

In the Iron Mountain, in the internal fires of Bretton Woods an alliance of the First Men and the Children of the Forest forged the Single Agreement: this would be the one agreement to rule them all, one agreement to margin them, one agreement to bind them in accordance with their terms, and in their darkness net them.

See also