83,223
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{G}}{{A|negotiation|}} | {{G}}{{A|negotiation|}} | ||
Playbooks derive from the belief that business | Playbooks derive from the belief that valuable business can be “solved” and can be run as an [[algorithm]], not a [[heuristic]].<ref>This is a bad idea. See {{author|Roger Martin}}’s {{br|The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking is the Next Competitive Advantage}}.</ref>. | ||
In {{author|Thomas Kuhn}}’s conception of it<ref>{{br|The Structure of Scientific Revolutions}}. It's a brilliant book. Read it. </ref> | In {{author|Thomas Kuhn}}’s conception of it<ref>{{br|The Structure of Scientific Revolutions}}. It's a brilliant book. Read it. </ref> playbooks are [[normal science]]: They map out the discovered world. They contain no mysteries or conundrums. They represent tilled, tended, bounded, fenced, arable land. Boundaries have been set, tolerances limited, parameters fixed, risks codified and processes fully understood. | ||
[[Playbook]]s are [[algorithm]]s for the [[meatware]]: they maximise efficiency when operating within a fully understood environment. The inhabit the [[known known]]s. | |||
As far as they go [[playbook]]s speak to the belief that ''the only material [[risk]] lies in not complying with established rules'': They are of a piece with the [[doctrine of precedent]]: when they run out of road, one must appeal to the help of a higher authority, by means of [[escalation]] to a [[control function]], the idea being (in theory, if not in practice) that the [[control function]] will develop the [[algorithm]] to deal with the new situation — ''[[stare decisis]]'' — and it will become part of the corpus and be fed back down into the playbook of established [[process]].<ref>This is rarely what happens in practice. [[control function]]s make ''[[ad hoc]]'' exceptions to the process, do not build them into the playbook as standard rules, meaning that the [[playbook]] has a natural sogginess (and therefore inefficiency).</ref> The [[algorithm]] operates set inside the organisation’s {{tag|risk}} tolerance (this is a good thing from a risk monitoring perspective, but a bad one from an efficiency perspective, as [[escalation]] is a wasteful and costly exercise. | |||
In theory the [[control function]] will have its own playbook, and the “court of first instance” is as bound by that as the baseline process is by the basic playbook. There is an [[algorithm]], a recipe, and the main ill that comes about is by not following it. | In theory the [[control function]] will have its own playbook, and the “court of first instance” is as bound by that as the baseline process is by the basic playbook. There is an [[algorithm]], a recipe, and the main ill that comes about is by not following it. |