82,464
edits
Set-off - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→{{2002ma}}
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==={{2002ma}}=== | ==={{2002ma}}=== | ||
The 2002 ISDA contains a standard {{isdaprov|Set-off}} provision which refers to a “Payer” and “Payee”. | The 2002 ISDA contains a standard {{isdaprov|Set-off}} provision which refers to a “Payer” and “Payee”. | ||
*'''Affiliates''': Either the | *'''Affiliates''': Either the “Payer” or the “Payee” could be the non-{{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}} or the non-{{isdaprov|Affected Party}} and so to include {{isdaprov|Affiliates}} into the 2002 Definition becomes problematic and cumbersome. Generally the market practice when using a 2002 schedule is therefore: | ||
**'''Where Affiliates are required''': to use bespoke wording; | **'''Where Affiliates are required''': to use bespoke wording; | ||
**'''Where Affiliates are not required''': and then fallback to the 2002 standard wording above. | **'''Where Affiliates are not required''': and then fallback to the 2002 standard wording above. | ||