83,056
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A two-word motif that, as much as any other, belies an [[Mediocre lawyer|attorney]]’s deep existential fear of his own language. It speaks of a nervousness that, should a dependent clause bite on something that isn’t there, somehow the whole linguistic edifice — even the mantle of the sky itself — will come crashing down. | A two-word motif that, as much as any other, belies an [[Mediocre lawyer|attorney]]’s deep existential fear of his own language. It speaks of a nervousness that, should a dependent clause bite on something that isn’t there, somehow the whole linguistic edifice — even the mantle of the sky itself — will come crashing down; a mantle that can, yet miraculously be affixed to the firmament with the single wipe of an attorney’s {{tag|flannel}}. | ||
{{plain|Each {{csaprov|Other CSA}}, [[if any]],|Any {{csaprov|Other CSA}}}} | {{plain|Each {{csaprov|Other CSA}}, [[if any]],|Any {{csaprov|Other CSA}}}} |