Backtesting: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
(Created page with "One of those cognitive dissonances that, for now, has passed into embarrassed history, but is sure to re-emerge the moment the financial market returns to giddy optimism that...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
One of those cognitive dissonances that, for now, has passed into embarrassed history, but is sure to re-emerge the moment the financial market returns to giddy optimism that characterizes large epochs of its history.
One of those cognitive dissonances that, for now, has passed into embarrassed history, but is sure to re-emerge the moment the financial markets regain their resting state of giddy optimism fueled by the delusional self-confidence of vain men.  


Back in the day, a resourceful [[salesperson]] with a clever new product (involving [[leveraged alpha]], for example) had to go through the motions of justifying its extraordinary potential when pitching it to their [[mark]]s<ref>Did I say “[[mark]]s”? I meant “sophisticated [[client]]s properly categorised for [[MiFID]] purposes as professionals who weren’t carpet-bagging blaggers, did have the slightest clue and weren’t remotely influenced by the [[corporate entertainment]] — golf, fine dining, [[hookers]] — with which they were lavishly festooned”.</ref>.
Back in the day, a resourceful [[salesperson]] with a clever new product (one that, you know, embedded [[leveraged alpha]], or something) had to go through the motions of justifying its “extraordinary potential”<ref>i.e., for sales credits</ref> when pitching it to their [[mark]]s<ref>Did I say “[[mark]]s”? I meant “sophisticated [[client]]s properly categorised for [[MiFID]] purposes as professionals who weren’t carpet-bagging blaggers, did have the slightest clue and weren’t remotely influenced by the [[corporate entertainment]] — golf, fine dining, [[hookers]] — with which they were lavishly festooned”.</ref>.


The problem with financial markets was, is, and always will be this: ''you can’t anticipate the future''. This isn’t a shortcoming of contemporary financial management techniques, by the way: it’s in amarket’s very nature. If you ''could'', you couldn’t make money betting on it.
The problem with financial markets was, is, and always will be this: ''you can’t anticipate the future''. This isn’t a shortcoming of contemporary financial management techniques, by the way: it’s in amarket’s very nature. If you ''could'', you couldn’t make money betting on it.

Navigation menu