Good egg: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
38 bytes removed ,  6 March 2017
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
[[Mediocre lawyer|Those]] who cherish the feel of {{tag|flannel}} close to their skin will take comfort in expressions like “[[all or substantially all]]”; “[[in whole or in part]]”, “[[one or more]]”; “[[unless otherwise agreed]]” . These expressions betray the fear that a judge reading your prose will take a perversely literal view, and construe your words deliberately to upset you; as the {{tag|Latin}}s say, “[[contra proferentem]]”.  
[[Mediocre lawyer|Those]] who cherish the feel of {{tag|flannel}} close to their skin will take comfort in expressions like “[[all or substantially all]]”; “[[in whole or in part]]”, “[[one or more]]”; “[[unless otherwise agreed]]” . These expressions betray the fear that a judge reading your prose will take a perversely literal view, and construe your words deliberately to upset you; as the {{tag|Latin}}s say, “[[contra proferentem]]”.  


But the law of the land is not there to frustrate your [[reasonable]] commercial intentions. A court will only do that if your intentions were base (as, to be sure, many a merchant’s will be if the opportunity arises to tilt the tables in his favour - Adam Smith had some choice things to say about that).  If you exploit a counterparty’s vulnerability or patent misapprehension, expect to find the awesome creative weight of the common law – [[estoppel]], [[constructive trust]]; [[money had and received]], ''[[assumpsit]]'' – incanted against you.  
But the law of the land is not there to frustrate honest commercial intentions. A court will only do that if a contracting merchant’s intentions are base (as, to be sure, many will be if the opportunity arises: Adam Smith had some choice things to say about that).  A fellow who exploits {{sex|his}} counterparty’s vulnerability or patent misapprehension can expect to find the awesome creative weight of the common law – [[estoppel]], [[constructive trust]]; [[money had and received]], ''[[assumpsit]]'' – incanted against him.  


If that’s your caper, don’t expect words on paper, however exquisitely turned, to help you.
If that’s your caper, don’t expect words on paper, however exquisitely turned, to help you.


But as long as it ''isn’t'' – as long as you act in [[good faith]] and a [[commercially reasonable manner]], loving your [[neighbour]] as you love yourself; doing unto others only what you would have them do to you – you have little to fear from a literal construction.
But if it ''isn’t'' – if you act in [[good faith]], [[commercially reasonable manner|reasonably]], loving your [[neighbour]] as you love yourself; doing unto others only what you would have them do to you – you have little to fear from a literal construction. The common law is your friend.


There is a (home-made, admittedly) {{tag|Latin}} maxim – ''[[anus matronae parvae malas leges faciunt]]'' (“little old ladies make bad law”) which, even though I made it up, may be the final, deepest foundation of the law of [[equity]]. It has a converse expression, also home made and converted into {{tag|Latin}} to make it sound plausible: [[non mentula esse]]: don’t be a dick. Be clear about what you want, and be a good egg, and you have little to fear from her majesty’s judiciary. [[Bonum ovum esse]], you know?
The {{tag|Latin}} maxim – ''[[anus matronae parvae malas leges faciunt]]'' (“little old ladies make bad law”), even though I made it up, may be the final, deepest foundation of the law of [[equity]]. It has a converse expression, also home made and converted into {{tag|Latin}} to make it sound plausible: [[non mentula esse]]: don’t be a dick. Be clear about what you want, [[be a good egg]] and you have little to fear from her majesty’s judiciary. [[Bonum ovum esse]], you know?


It is true that [[common law]] formulated in the service of [[wronged spinsters]] presents later courts who are bound by it with hefty intellectual challenges, but no self respecting judge shies away from those – they’re what {{sex|she}} took the oath for in the first place.  
It is true that [[common law]] formulated in the service of [[wronged spinsters]] presents later courts who are bound by it with hefty intellectual challenges, but no self respecting judge shies away from those – they’re what {{sex|she}} took the oath for in the first place.  

Navigation menu