All our other counterparties have agreed this: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


You can rely on the [[in-house lawyer]]’s stock answer – “last I heard, we hadn’t outsourced our internal control function to our competitors” – and that should be the end of it. Or you could call your client’s bluff. Ask which of your peers has agreed such suicidal terms. Ask for copies of the [[contract]]s in which they did so.
You can rely on the [[in-house lawyer]]’s stock answer – “last I heard, we hadn’t outsourced our internal control function to our competitors” – and that should be the end of it. Or you could call your client’s bluff. Ask which of your peers has agreed such suicidal terms. Ask for copies of the [[contract]]s in which they did so.
{{egg}}
This will outrage your client (and, on his behalf, your salesperson) but he really has only himself to blame: he brought it up. He can hardly appeal to the confidentiality of contracts which, in his previous breath, he was happy to tell you all about.


Now another broker may have agreed these terms. Perhaps it really was as supine or foolish as your client is asking you to be: it is always nice to know your competitors’ weaknesses. But that doesn’t mean you should follow suit. Most likely, the concession was subject to a giant [[quid pro quo]] your counterparty has “forgotten” to mention. And the broker may have only appeared to concede the point, skilfully burying a countermeasure in a schedule, side letter or in a crafty [[double negative]] in the definitions section.
This will outrage your [[client]] (and, on his behalf, your [[salesperson]]) but he really has only himself to blame: he brought it up. He can hardly appeal to the confidentiality of contracts which, in his previous breath, he was happy to tell you all about.
 
Now another broker may have agreed these terms. Perhaps it really was as supine or foolish as your [[client]] is asking you to be: it is always nice to know your competitors’ weaknesses. But that doesn’t mean you should follow suit. Most likely, the concession was subject to a giant [[quid pro quo]] your counterparty has neglected to mention. And the [[broker]] may have only ''appeared'' to concede the point, skilfully burying a countermeasure in a schedule, [[side letter]] or a crafty [[double negative]] in the definitions section.


There are many commercial and legal reasons to agree to unpalatable terms. That “all your competitors have agreed it” is not one of them.
There are many commercial and legal reasons to agree to unpalatable terms. That “all your competitors have agreed it” is not one of them.


''[[disclaimer]]: The descriptions of [[salespeople]] in this article are all fictional. Any resemblance to any [[salesperson]], alive or dead, is entirely coincidental. Like, totally.''
''[[disclaimer]]: The descriptions of [[salespeople]] in this article are all fictional. Any resemblance to any [[salesperson]], alive or dead, is entirely coincidental. Like, totally.''
{{egg}}
{{published}}

Navigation menu