General counsel: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
A handsome silvered fifty five year-old midwesterner with the bearing, and legal acumen, of a 747 pilot. If you encounter him in the lift he won’t have a clue who you are, even though you have worked in his department since 1998.  
A handsome silvered fifty five year-old midwesterner with the bearing, and legal acumen, of a 747 pilot. If you encounter him in the lift he won’t have a clue who you are, even though you have worked in his department since 1998.  


General counsel habitually float above the messy tedium of actual legal work. They owe their elevated position to a knack for side-stepping difficult decisions — something which, in a large organization during peacetime, it is easy to do, especially one with well-functioning [[escalation circle]]s. Being commander-in-chief of the armed forces is a cinch when the nation is not at war. Thus, most [[general counsel]] are inclined to attribute their position to their own extraordinary judgment, commercial nous and deep client relationships rather than having been mucking about in a dinghy far out on the tidal flats when the rising tide came in that floats all boats. They will even, humbly but without irony, accept [[industry awards]] for their talents. If you are lucky, they’ll modestly attribute their unique achievements to their wonderful team, without which none of their ''legerdemain'' would have been possible.
General counsel habitually float above the messy tedium of actual legal work. They owe their elevated position to a knack for side-stepping difficult decisions — something which, in a large organization during peacetime, it is easy to do, especially one with well-functioning [[escalation circle]]s. Being commander-in-chief of the armed forces is a cinch when the nation is not at war.  


Their main challenge is justifying their position at all. They like to be seen as visionaries, and will embrace behaviour which speaks to their grand strategic vision. They might commission a global coverage model, or a detailed, multi-dimensional [[risk taxonomy]]. Completion of this futile exercise will be left to their teams, of course.
But no-one likes to admit they simply tinned it. Thus, most [[general counsel]] are [[inclined to]] attribute their success to their own extraordinary judgment, commercial nous and deep client relationships rather than having happened to have been mucking about in a dinghy on the tidal flats when the rising tide came in which floats all boats. General counsel will even, occasionally but without irony, accept [[industry awards]] for their talents. Those with an ounce of self-awareness will loudly attribute the gong to the relentless hard work and unique skill mix of their team, without which none of their ''legerdemain'' would have been possible. But egotists won’t.
 
The main challenge for a modern-day [[general counsel]] is justifying {{sex|his}} position at all. He likes to be seen as a visionary, an agent for change, a revolutioniser — when of course no experienced lawyer is anything of the sort: that behaviour is systematically beaten out of a profession based on something called the [[doctrine of precedent]]. A GC will therefore speak frequently of his grand strategic vision. When not consenting to video-interviews for the intranet, a good GC will be advocating resource fluidity or commission a detailed, multi-dimensional [[risk taxonomy]]. management of this task will be in the hands of his [[COO]], and the hard-yards saddled on jobbing lawyers whom, you’d think, would be better spending their time actually managing risk, rather than inspecting ones navel looking for it.


{{dramatis personae}}
{{dramatis personae}}
{{egg}}
{{egg}}
{{draft}}

Navigation menu