I never said you couldn’t: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
A kind of [[profound ontological uncertainty]] which leads to proliferating [[incluso]]s and [[for the avoidance of doubt]]s, is the [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyer]]'s reluctance to grasp a simple proposition: ''You don’t have document what you are '''not''' obliged do in a legal contract''. In the absence of a contract you are not obliged to do ''anything''.
A kind of [[profound ontological uncertainty]] which leads to proliferating [[incluso]]s and [[for the avoidance of doubt]]s, is the [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyer]]’s reluctance to grasp a simple proposition: ''You don’t have document what you are '''not''' obliged do in a legal contract''. In the absence of a contract you are not obliged to do ''anything''.
 
Which brings us to Nasty. {{video nasty}}


Which brings us to ''Nasty''.
{{video nasty}}
This is the lawyer's take on that old philosophical adage: [[the onus of proof is on the person making an existential claim]].
This is the lawyer's take on that old philosophical adage: [[the onus of proof is on the person making an existential claim]].


Navigation menu