Termination Events - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{fullanatopen|isda|{{ISDA 1992 Section 5 TOC}}}}
==Termination Events and Events of Default==
==Termination Events and Events of Default==
{{isdaprov|Termination Events}} and {{isdaprov|Events of Default}} under an {{isdama}} are similar in that when they occur to one party (the {{isdaprov|Affected Party}} or {{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}}) the other may terminate outstanding trades under the agreement. A crucial difference between them is that events of default may give rise to third-party default rights (where the relevant {{isdaprov|Cross Default}} extends to derivatives and trading documents) but generally termination events under an ISDA Master Agreement with another dealer will not.  
{{isdaprov|Termination Events}} and {{isdaprov|Events of Default}} under an {{isdama}} are similar in that when they occur to one party (the {{isdaprov|Affected Party}} or {{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}}) the other may terminate outstanding trades under the agreement. A crucial difference between them is that events of default may give rise to third-party default rights (where the relevant {{isdaprov|Cross Default}} extends to derivatives and trading documents) but generally termination events under an ISDA Master Agreement with another dealer will not.  
Line 6: Line 7:
==={{t|Trick for young players}}: {{isdaprov|Force Majeure Event}}===
==={{t|Trick for young players}}: {{isdaprov|Force Majeure Event}}===
Note that the {{2002ma}} includes a {{isdaprov|Force Majeure Event}}, using language that was already agreed and widely inserted into the {{1992ma}} Schedule prior to its publication. Because this was entered as Section 5(b)(ii), this necessitates some numbering differences between the two versions of the {{isdama}} - a drafting [[trick for young players]] to watch out for.  
Note that the {{2002ma}} includes a {{isdaprov|Force Majeure Event}}, using language that was already agreed and widely inserted into the {{1992ma}} Schedule prior to its publication. Because this was entered as Section 5(b)(ii), this necessitates some numbering differences between the two versions of the {{isdama}} - a drafting [[trick for young players]] to watch out for.  
{{isdasnap|5(b)}}
==Subsections to Section 5(b) {{isdama}}==
==Subsections to Section 5(b) {{isdama}}==
:(b) {{isdaprov|Termination Events}}
:(b) {{isdaprov|Termination Events}}

Navigation menu