Relevant: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
2 bytes removed ,  17 April 2018
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Like the even ghastlier “[[applicable]]”, an adjective that carries precisely no semantic content. For, if a concept is ''not'' relevant, [[it goes without saying]] that it is not — well, ''relevant'' to the subject at hand. So one hardly needs to add a qualifier to distinguish the things you are not talking about from ones that you are.
Like the even ghastlier “[[applicable]]”, an adjective that carries precisely no semantic content. For, if a concept is ''not'' relevant, [[it goes without saying]] that it is not — well, ''relevant'' to the subject at hand. So one hardly needs to add a qualifier to distinguish the things you are not talking about from ones that you are.


To pull a random example from the {{eqderivs}}:
To pull a random example from the {{eqdefs}}:
:''{{Template:2002 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions 1.16}}''  
:''{{Template:2002 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions 1.16}}''  


Navigation menu