Sovereign immunity: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Percy and Queenie.png|thumb|[[Percy, who's Queen?]]]]
Why would an entity — regardless of its absolute executive power — think it should ever be entitled to claim immunity from suit on a commercial contract?
There is ''no'' good reason, except “[[Percy, who’s Queen?]]”.
The [[Sovereign Immunity Act 1978]]<ref>https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1978/33</ref>, which provides (among other things) that a State is not immune as respects proceedings relating to a commercial transaction entered into by the State; or an obligation of the State which by virtue of a contract (whether a commercial transaction or not) falls to be performed wholly or partly in the United Kingdom.
The [[Sovereign Immunity Act 1978]]<ref>https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1978/33</ref>, which provides (among other things) that a State is not immune as respects proceedings relating to a commercial transaction entered into by the State; or an obligation of the State which by virtue of a contract (whether a commercial transaction or not) falls to be performed wholly or partly in the United Kingdom.


Navigation menu