Disputed Calculations or Valuations - CSA Provision: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{fullanat2|csa|4(a)|2016|4(a)|1995}}
{{csaanat|4(a)|2016}}
The actual wording is in the infobox on the right-hand side, but you may find it easier to read the nutshell summary, since in its 2016 version CSA ISDA not only passed up the opportunity to make this unused-in-practice language simpler, but [[bloody-minded]]ly made it worse, by providing anally-retentive alternatives for {{2002isda}} and {{1992isda}} close-out methodologies. Which is just spectacular.
The actual wording is in the infobox on the right-hand side, but you may find it easier to read the nutshell summary, since in its 2016 version CSA ISDA not only passed up the opportunity to make this unused-in-practice language simpler, but [[bloody-minded]]ly made it worse, by providing anally-retentive alternatives for {{2002isda}} and {{1992isda}} close-out methodologies. Which is just spectacular.
{{Nuts|4(a)|1995 CSA}}<br>
 
{{csaprov|Disputed Calculations or Valuations}} is a topic that could unfurl like the flower of a deadly insect-eating nightshade if you let it. DON’T LET IT.
{{csaprov|Disputed Calculations or Valuations}} is a topic that could unfurl like the flower of a deadly insect-eating nightshade if you let it. DON’T LET IT.
====What can be disputed?====
====What can be disputed?====

Navigation menu