Walk-away: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
166 bytes added ,  16 November 2018
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
So far so good.
So far so good.


But contentious negotiation points tend to be the tail events: disaster scenarios: total loss of trust; insolvency – things that happen when the contract doesn’t go as planned. You don’t ask for an event of default because you hope to use it. In a perfect world, everything is rosy, we each make bags of money trading and no one casts another glance at that master agreement.  
But contentious negotiation points tend to be the tail events: disaster scenarios: total loss of trust; insolvency – things that happen when the contract doesn’t go as planned. You don’t ask for an [[event of default]] because you hope to use it. Closing out an agreement is about cutting losses, not making profit. You make a profit by trading under the agreement. In a perfect world, everything is rosy, we each make bags of money trading with each other and, once it’s inked, no one casts a backward glance at that [[master agreement]].  


Therefore these events:
Therefore these events:

Navigation menu