Re: Fw: RE: Re: RE: Antwort: Re: RE Re: Interminable rambling chain that dates back to 2010: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
That thinking when, at 5:55pm on a Friday, you get an email with this heading and “[[Adding]] @Mike” — you, of course, being Mike — to an [[email canoe]] that is shipping a ton of brackish water. The top line will sit above forty or fifty lateral feet, if printed out, of undiluted tedium concerning a never-especially-active account that was closed in 2006, and will usually run as follows:
That thinking when, at 5:55pm on a Friday, you get an email with this heading and “[[Adding]] @Mike” — you, of course, being Mike — to an [[email canoe]] that is shipping a ton of brackish water. The top line will sit above forty or fifty lateral feet, if printed out, of undiluted tedium concerning a never-especially-active account that was closed in 2006, and will usually run as follows:


+ @Mike could you opine please?
{{email canoe}}


To which the correct reply is “on what?” for you may be assured that whatever time you spend scrolling down the chain will reveal little that can enlighten you as to what the question was, or if there even was a question, but will validate every suspicion you’ve ever had as to the inbuilt and institutional stupidity, ignorance and primordial ''[[fear]]'' that is encoded in your institution’s every impulse.
To which the correct reply is “on what?” for you may be assured that whatever time you spend scrolling down the chain will reveal little that can enlighten you as to what the question was, or if there even was a question, but will validate every suspicion you’ve ever had as to the inbuilt and institutional stupidity, ignorance and primordial ''[[fear]]'' that is encoded in your institution’s every impulse.

Navigation menu