Audit: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,130 bytes added ,  10 January 2019
no edit summary
(Created page with "{{a|risk}}")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|risk}}
{{a|risk|}}
In a {{risk|firm}} the {{risk|audit}} trail fulfils following functions:
*'''Documenting compliance''': evidence of compliance with internal policy and process, albeit this is [[substance and form|form without reference to substance]].
*'''Assign responsibility''': To memorialise decision-making — to assign individual responsibility — but at the same time to record qualifications, derogations, assumptions and conditions upon those decisions — that is, to ''diffuse'' responsibility for the decision.
 
The key for decision-makers is to articulate ''qualitative'' conditions — that require comprehension of the subject matter — and not quantitative ones, that can be easily measured by the audit function. This allows the [[SME]], to whom the consultant will inevitably turn, to create her own qualitative conditions. If she is experienced, her conditions will be in the gift of a third SME, who will create her own qualitative conditions in the gift of a fourth. Eventually the trail will lead in a bureaucratic [[Möbius loop]] back to legal, and the [[Circle of escalation|circle of diffusion]] will be complete.

Navigation menu