Substance and form: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
This is a [[correlation]], though, not [[causation]], and it won’t flow the other way. Just because you put the kettle on at 4:30 doesn't mean you were watching the football, however likely it might seem. Probability is an is, not an ought.  
This is a [[correlation]], though, not [[causation]], and it won’t flow the other way. Just because you put the kettle on at 4:30 doesn't mean you were watching the football, however likely it might seem. Probability is an is, not an ought.  


Hume: you cannot derive an “ought” from an “is”. The [[JC]]: you cannot derive an “is” from an “ought”.
Hume: you cannot derive an “ought” from an “is”.  
 
The [[JC]]: you cannot derive an “is” from an “ought”.


{{Tabletop}}
{{Tabletop}}
Line 26: Line 28:
|[[Compliance]]
|[[Compliance]]
|-
|-
|
|Anything fun or interesting in the world
|[[HR]], [[COO]], [[Management consultant]], [[middle management]]
|[[HR]], [[COO]], [[Management consultant]], [[middle management]]
{{tablebottom}}
{{tablebottom}}

Navigation menu