Negligence: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
[[Negligence]] is an invention of the law of {{tag|tort}} which defines the general duties people have to each other ''where they don’t have a {{tag|contract}}''.  
[[Negligence]] is an invention of the law of {{tag|tort}} which defines the general duties people have to each other ''where they don’t have a {{tag|contract}}''.  


So if I am navigating my punt and I hit yours, and it sinks, then I have caused you a loss. Since I didn’t have a contract with you — you are,m in the vernacular, a “[[random]]” — the law must decide whether I should nevertheless be liable to pay you compensation.
So if I am [[Fardell v Potts - Case Note|navigating my punt]] and I hit yours, and it sinks, then I have caused you a loss. Since I didn’t have a contract with you — you are, in the vernacular, a “[[random]]” — the law must decide whether I should nevertheless be liable to pay you compensation.


The common law does this by:  
The {{tag|common law}} does this by:  
*Prescribing the kind of relationship between randoms that give rise to obligations (whether they are “[[Neighbour|neighbours]]” – people whom one should reasonably anticipate might be affected by one’s careless punting), and  
*Prescribing the kind of relationship between randoms that give rise to obligations (whether they are “[[Neighbour|neighbours]]” – people whom one should reasonably anticipate might be affected by one’s [[Fardell v Potts - Case Note|careless punting]]), and  
*If they ''are'' neighbours, describing what is my general “[[duty of care]]” to them.
*If they ''are'' [[neighbour]]s, describing what is my general “[[duty of care]]” to them.


This duty of care was to behave like (if you’ll excuse the dated vernacular) a “[[reasonable man]]”. Someone who is prudent, thoughtful and considerate without being a saint. Famously described as “the [[man on the Clapham Omnibus]]”. In [[A. P. Herbert]]’s immortal words,  
This duty of care was to behave like (if you’ll excuse the dated vernacular) a “[[reasonable man]]”. Someone who is prudent, thoughtful and considerate without being a saint. Famously described as “the [[man on the Clapham Omnibus]]”. In [[A. P. Herbert]]’s immortal words,  
Line 15: Line 15:


{{seealso}}
{{seealso}}
*The great case of {{casenote|Fardell|Potts}}
*{{casenote|Donoghue|Stephenson}}
*{{casenote|Donoghue|Stephenson}}
*[[Contractual negligence]]
*[[Contractual negligence]]
*[[Gross negligence]]
*[[Gross negligence]]

Navigation menu