Repudiation: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{g}}To repudiate a [[contract]] is to indicate an inability or unwillingness to perform it in such a way as to deprive the aggrieved party of substantially the whole benefit of the bargain represented by the contract.
{{g}}To repudiate a [[contract]] is to indicate an inability or unwillingness to perform it in such a way as to deprive the aggrieved party of substantially the whole benefit of the bargain represented by the contract.


A “repudiatory” [[breach of contract]] is a one which is sufficiently serious to indicate a party has repudiated the {{tag|contract}}, thereby entitling the innocent party to [[terminate]] the {{tag|contract}}.
A “[[Repudiatory breach|repudiatory]]”  or “[[Fundamental breach|fundamental]]” [[breach of contract]] is a one which is sufficiently serious to indicate a party has repudiated the {{tag|contract}}, thereby entitling the innocent party to [[terminate]] the {{tag|contract}}.


In this case the innocent party has two options: It can  
In this case the innocent party has two options: It can  
Line 9: Line 9:
The $64,000 question: What counts as “sufficiently serious”?
The $64,000 question: What counts as “sufficiently serious”?


Does “failure to pay an amount due by the time specified in a contract” constitute a repudiatory breach? Usually failure to pay may be a specific [[event of default]] prescribing exactly what should happen — so this question is moot — but it may apply where you have a lender of a revolving credit facility, or a prime broker.  
Does “failure to pay an amount due by the time specified in a contract” constitute a [[repudiatory breach]]? Usually failure to pay may be a specific [[event of default]] prescribing exactly what should happen — so this question is moot — but it may apply where you have a lender of a revolving credit facility, or a prime broker.  


If your contract stipulates that [[time is of the essence]], then yes. If not, then it will depend on the circumstances. If the failure was due to a [[force majeure]]-style external event, probably not. If the failure to pay was accompanied by an extended middle finger, more likely.
If your contract stipulates that [[time is of the essence]], then yes. If not, then it will depend on the circumstances. If the [[failure to pay]] was due to a [[force majeure]]-style external event, probably not. If the failure to pay was accompanied by an extended middle finger, more likely.


{{sa}}
{{sa}}

Navigation menu