82,247
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A good outing for the Civil Division of the Court of Appeal (Queen's Bench Division) which raises the question of what is “{{tag|commercially reasonable}}” in the context of determinations made by parties to financial instruments. Certain guarantees issued by Barclays granted Unicredit optional termination rights some of which required Barclays’ prior consent | {{cn}}A good outing for the Civil Division of the Court of Appeal (Queen's Bench Division) which raises the question of what is “{{tag|commercially reasonable}}” in the context of determinations made by parties to financial instruments. Certain guarantees issued by Barclays granted Unicredit optional termination rights some of which required Barclays’ prior consent | ||
“to be determined by [Barclays] in a commercially reasonable manner.” | “to be determined by [Barclays] in a commercially reasonable manner.” | ||