Prisoner’s dilemma: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
===The original dilemma===
===The original dilemma===
Two people are  charged with a conspiracy<ref>Whether or not they are guilty is beside the point. If it helps you empathise with their predicament, assume they’re innocent</ref>.  Each is held separately. They cannot communicate. There  is enough evidence to convict both on a lesser charge, but not the main charge. Each prisoner is separately offered the same plea bargain. The offer is:
Two people are  charged with a conspiracy<ref>Whether or not they are guilty is beside the point. If it helps you empathise with their predicament, assume they’re innocent</ref>.  Each is held separately. They cannot communicate. There  is enough evidence to convict both on a lesser charge, but not the main charge. Each prisoner is separately offered the same plea bargain. The offer is:
*If A informs B but B refuses to inform on A:
{{prisonersdilemmatable}}*If A informs B but B refuses to inform on A:
**A will not be prosecuted at all and will go free  
**A will not be prosecuted at all and will go free  
**B will be convicted of the main charge and will get '''3''' years in prison.
**B will be convicted of the main charge and will get '''3''' years in prison.
Line 14: Line 14:
**A will get 1 year in prison  (on the lesser charge).
**A will get 1 year in prison  (on the lesser charge).
**B will get 1 year in prison (on the lesser charge).
**B will get 1 year in prison (on the lesser charge).
{{prisonersdilemmatable}}


Another way of looking at this, for those easily triggered, is as the [[eBayer’s dilemma]].
Another way of looking at this, for those easily triggered, is as the [[eBayer’s dilemma]].


===Single round prisoner’s dilemma===
===[[Single round prisoner’s dilemma]]===
If you play the game once, and in isolation — with someone you don’t know and whom you do not expect to meet again, the payoff is grim: those who cooperate will get ''reamed''. Cooperation is a bad strategy. Your best interest is in defecting on the other guy, because ''his'' best interest is defecting on ''you''.  
If you play the game once, and in isolation — with someone you don’t know and whom you do not expect to meet again, the payoff is grim: those who cooperate will get ''reamed''. Cooperation is a bad strategy. Your best interest is in defecting on the other guy, because ''his'' best interest is defecting on ''you''.  


Navigation menu