82,028
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{g}}The [[underlying asset]], or [[underlyer]], or [[underlier]], or [[reference asset]] — call it what you will — is that thing of which your [[derivative]] ''is'' derivative. | {{g}}The [[underlying asset]], or [[underlyer]], or [[underlier]], or [[reference asset]] — call it what you will — is that thing of which your [[derivative]] ''is'' derivative. | ||
Not to be confused with the [[undying]], of course, and certainly not after sun-down. | Not to be confused with the [[undying]], of course, and certainly not after sun-down. | ||
We naughty old contrarian types like to use "{{eqderivprov|underlier}}" as shorthand in the {{eqderivdefs}} even though it isn't, as such, a thing. | |||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Nosferatu]] | *[[Nosferatu]] | ||
*[[Underlier - Equity Derivatives Provision]] | |||
{{bg}} | {{bg}} |