Injunction: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
342 bytes added ,  5 November 2019
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The [[injunction]] is an [[equitable]] [[remedy]] that originated in the English [[Courts of chancery|courts of equity]] to provide redress for wrongs for which an award of money [[damages]] doesn’t quite scratch the itch. An [[injunction]] can be given only when there is "no adequate remedy at law." So, “M’lud I don’t want money. I want him to stop doing what he’s doing, that he promised he wouldn't.” Obvious examples where this principal is fairly self-evidently so are [[Confidentiality obligation - Confi Provision|confidentiality obligations]].
{{g}}The [[injunction]] is an [[equitable]] [[remedy]] that originated in the English [[Courts of chancery|courts of equity]] to provide redress for wrongs for which an award of money [[damages]] doesn’t quite scratch the itch. An [[injunction]] can be given only when there is "no adequate remedy at law." So, “M’lud I don’t want money. I want him to stop doing what he’s doing, that he promised he wouldn't.” Obvious examples where this principal is fairly self-evidently so are [[Confidentiality obligation - Confi Provision|confidentiality obligations]].


The common conception, at least among the draughtspeople of [[confidentiality agreement]]s, is that counterparties who expressly acknowledge that their contractual obligations are not of the type where [[damages]] are necessarily an adequate remedy improve a litigant’s odds of winning an injunction later. It is common see confidentiality agreements to just that.  
The common conception, at least among the draughtspeople of [[confidentiality agreement]]s, is that expressly acknowledging that one’s contractual obligations are not of the type where [[damages]] will be an adequate remedy improve a litigant’s odds of winning an injunction later. It is common see [[confidentiality agreement]]s do just that.
 
But — and here’s the snippy bit — in the commercial world, anything of value is meant to be quantifiable in the dollars and sense. [[Homo economicus]]’ view might be blinkered, it might be philistine — but it conforms to classic economics theory. So in one sense if the right you feel has been infringed, ''it can’t have been very valuable''.  


{{seealso}}
{{seealso}}
*{{confiprov|Remedies}} in the context of our lovely [[Confi Anatomy]]
*{{confiprov|Remedies}} in the context of our lovely [[Confi Anatomy]]

Navigation menu