Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|negotiation|
{{a|negotiation|
[[File:Third man.jpg|450px|thumb|center|Why the hostility towards third parties, [[counsellor]]? What did they ever to do you?]]
[[File:Third man.jpg|450px|thumb|center|Why the hostility towards third parties, [[counsellor]]? What did they ever to do you?]]
}}It is now lost in the mists of time, but once upon a time there must have been a reason why lawyers of the international capital markets were so collectively hostile to the [[Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999]], a small piece of well-intended legislation which allowed contractual parties to agree that persons benefiting from their contract, but who were not parties to it (and therefore did not have “[[privity of contract]]” required by the [[common law]]), might, upon a breach, be allowed to sue directly to recover their loss.
}}It is now lost in the mists of history, but once upon a time there must have been a reason why lawyers of the international capital markets were so collectively hostile to the [[Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999]], a small piece of well-intended legislation which allowed contractual parties to agree that persons benefiting from their contract, but who were not parties to it (and therefore did not have “[[privity of contract]]” required by the [[common law]]), might, upon a breach, be allowed to sue directly to recover their loss.


Who could object to that?
Who could object to that?

Navigation menu