Value - CSA Provision: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{fullanat2|csa|Value|1995|Value|2016}}
{{csaanat|Value|1995}}
===2016 changes===
===2016 changes===
Basically to add in the {{csaprov|FX Haircut Percentage}} into the multiplier, that being (in some jurisdictions) a fairly hefty surcharge for those people who like to collateralize in a currency other than the one in which their derivatives are denominated.
Basically to add in the {{csaprov|FX Haircut Percentage}} into the multiplier, that being (in some jurisdictions) a fairly hefty surcharge for those people who like to collateralize in a currency other than the one in which their derivatives are denominated.
{{ineligiblecreditsupport}}
{{ineligiblecreditsupport}}


===="{{csaprov|Base Currency Equivalent}} of bid price"====
===="{{csaprov|Base Currency Equivalent}} of [[bid price]]"====
It is not unknown to amend limb (ii) to include "the {{csaprov|Base Currency Equivalent}} of the bid price obtained by the {{csaprov|Valuation Agent}} ''multiplied by the nominal amount of such security''".  
It is not unknown to amend limb (ii) to include "the {{csaprov|Base Currency Equivalent}} of the bid price obtained by the {{csaprov|Valuation Agent}} ''multiplied by the nominal amount of such security''".  


This is presumably to cater for the argument that a "bid price" is a percentage figure. But "base currency equivalent" already impliedly converts any percentage value into cash amount. And if the {{csaprov|Eligible Credit Support}} includes collateral other that debt instruments (e.g., equities), reference to a nominal amount muiltiplier is potentially confusing.
This is presumably to cater for the pedantic argument — just the sort of argument that a diligent [[legal eagle]] with nothing better to do loves to run — that a “[[bid price]]” could be a percentage figure of a nominal amount, instead of a cash value, and this might upset the calculation. I mean, really.
 
But even if a “price” isn’t necessarily a cash amount — to be sure, trading folk do talk that way sometimes, even if most sensible working folk don’t — the idea of the “{{csaprov|Base Currency Equivalent}}” of that price certainly turns it into one. You can’t exactly have “USD 86%”, can you? And if the {{csaprov|Eligible Credit Support}} includes [[collateral]] other than [[cash]] or [[Debt security|debt instrument]]s (e.g., [[equities]]), reference to a nominal amount multiplier is potentially confusing.

Navigation menu