81,912
edits
Absent a written agreement between the parties that expressly imposes affirmative obligations to the contrary for that transaction: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Absent a written agreement between the parties that expressly imposes affirmative obligations to the contrary for that transaction (view source)
Revision as of 08:40, 19 January 2020
, 19 January 2020no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Now, a {{t|contract}} is simply a legally binding agreement. Nothing ''but'' a legally binding agreement. As long as one party is happy with the arrangement, the other is stuck with it. | Now, a {{t|contract}} is simply a legally binding agreement. Nothing ''but'' a legally binding agreement. As long as one party is happy with the arrangement, the other is stuck with it. | ||
But it is axiomatic that if ''neither'' is happy with the arrangement, they can agree to | But it is axiomatic that if ''neither'' is happy with the arrangement, they can agree to change it. They may change their minds. If they agree to do something different, that is that. If they “agree otherwise”, then otherwise it must be. ''One need not say this''. | ||
If it is meaningless to say “[[Unless otherwise agreed|unless agreed otherwise]]”, then how fantastical must it be to say, “absent a written agreement between the parties that expressly imposes affirmative obligations to the contrary for that transaction”? | If it is meaningless to say “[[Unless otherwise agreed|unless agreed otherwise]]”, then how fantastical must it be to say, “absent a written agreement between the parties that expressly imposes affirmative obligations to the contrary for that transaction”? | ||