West Midland Baptist (Trust) Assn v Birmingham: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
(Created page with "{{cn}} {{Capsule West Midland Baptist Trust}}")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{cn}}
{{cn}}On the question of whether, a court having suddenly realised that it had been wrong about the [[common law]] for decades, could agree to uphold its new correct understanding of the same prospectively only. A question thrown into sharp relief by the Lehman insolvency, and in particular {{casenote|Re Spectrum Plus}}.
 
No, as it turned out.
{{Capsule West Midland Baptist Trust}}
{{Capsule West Midland Baptist Trust}}
{{sa}}
{{casenote|Re Spectrum Plus}}

Navigation menu