Basic Representations - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{manual|MI|2002|3(a)|Section|3(a)|short}}
{{isdaanat|3(a)}}
{{isdaanat|3(a)}}
An observant negotiator (is there any other kind?) handling a {{1992ma}} might wish to add a new agency rep as Section {{isdaprov|3(a)(vi)}}. The framers of the {{isdama}} obviously thought this was such a good idea that they added a brand-new no-agency rep to the {{2002ma}}, only they can’t have felt it was basic enough to go in the {{isdaprov|Basic Representations}}, so they put it in a new clause all by itself at Section {{isdaprov|3(g)}}.
But you don’t need a bespoke no-agency rep if you’re on a {{2002ma}}, if that’s what you’re wondering.


{{ISDA 2002 Section 3 TOC}}
{{ISDA 2002 Section 3 TOC}}

Navigation menu