SFTR: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
381 bytes added ,  14 February 2020
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
This is the regulatory initiative that, so say some commentators, nearly caused the [[boredom heat death]] of the universe when a well-meaning [[torpidity]]<ref>A [[torpidity]] is the [[collective noun]] for a group of [[industry association]]s. True.</ref> of [[industry association]]s produced a [[Media:SFTR-information-statement.pdf|5,000 word disclosure document]] explaining to seasoned industry professionals (whom you would think would know) what was meant by “[[title transfer]]”. This is mandated by Article 15 of SFTR to be sent wherever there is a [[title transfer collateral arrangement]]. Where, as in [[stock lending]] and [[derivatives]] trading, there is a ''mutual'' [[title transfer collateral arrangement]] (sometimes ''I'' have to post ''you'' collateral; sometimes ''you'' have to post ''me'' collateral), this leads to the faintly<ref>There goes that British understatement again: I’m learning, after thirty years in these isles.</ref> absurd requirement for the counterparties to send each other the identical risk notification. WAY TO GO, ESMA.
This is the regulatory initiative that, so say some commentators, nearly caused the [[boredom heat death]] of the universe when a well-meaning [[torpidity]]<ref>A [[torpidity]] is the [[collective noun]] for a group of [[industry association]]s. True.</ref> of [[industry association]]s produced a [[Media:SFTR-information-statement.pdf|5,000 word disclosure document]] explaining to seasoned industry professionals (whom you would think would know) what was meant by “[[title transfer]]”. This is mandated by Article 15 of SFTR to be sent wherever there is a [[title transfer collateral arrangement]]. Where, as in [[stock lending]] and [[derivatives]] trading, there is a ''mutual'' [[title transfer collateral arrangement]] (sometimes ''I'' have to post ''you'' collateral; sometimes ''you'' have to post ''me'' collateral), this leads to the faintly<ref>There goes that British understatement again: I’m learning, after thirty years in these isles.</ref> absurd requirement for the counterparties to send each other the identical risk notification. WAY TO GO, ESMA.


===Transaction reporting===
===[[Transaction reporting]]===
SFTR also requires transaction reporting of securities financing arrangements. This is different from EMIR and MIFID trade and transaction reporting — for one thing the exact time and price of execution of a stock loan is less interesting data point, seeing as you can cancel the stock loan at any time before or after settlement, so the decision to deal is moot, and there isn’t really a price, since ([[QED]]) a stock lender keeps economic exposure to the price risk of the stock, while the borrower only takes economic exposure to a borrowed stock by short selling it into the market — which is a different transaction (a cash equity sale), not connected to the [[stock loan]], and which which would be covered by the Emir transaction reporting regime (where decision to deal, price etc is important).
SFTR requires transaction reporting of [[securities financing]] arrangements. SFTR transaction reporting is different from [[EMIR]] and [[MIFID]] trade and transaction reporting — for one thing, the exact time and price of execution of a [[stock loan]] is less critical data point, seeing as either side can cancel a [[stock loan]] at any time without penalty (before or after settlement), so the time of decision to deal is moot — do you ever really become bound to trade a stock loan? Nor, really, is there a price at which you trade a stock loan, since ([[QED]]) a stock lender just delivers a share to the borrower, but keeps economic exposure to the price risk of the stock, while the borrower only takes economic exposure to a borrowed stock when (and if) the borrower [[Short selling|short sells]] it into the market — which is a different transaction (a [[cash equity]] sale), not connected to the [[stock loan]] — it is none of the lender’s business whether the borrower sells the stock or holds it — and if the borrower does sell the stock, that transaction would be covered by the EMIR transaction reporting regime (where decision to deal, price etc is important).


==={{t|SFTR}} versus {{t|EMIR}}: Regulatory Deathmatch===
==={{t|SFTR}} versus {{t|EMIR}}: Regulatory Deathmatch===

Navigation menu