Cross Default - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 54: Line 54:
If the cross default applies, the terms of any Specified Indebtedness owed by the counterparty above the Threshold are, in effect, indirectly incorporated into the {{isdama}}. For example, the breach of a financial covenant in a qualifying loan facility, '''even if not acted upon by the lender of that facility'''  would give a swap counterparty the right to terminate transactions under the ISDA Master even though the ISDA Master itself contains no financial covenants.
If the cross default applies, the terms of any Specified Indebtedness owed by the counterparty above the Threshold are, in effect, indirectly incorporated into the {{isdama}}. For example, the breach of a financial covenant in a qualifying loan facility, '''even if not acted upon by the lender of that facility'''  would give a swap counterparty the right to terminate transactions under the ISDA Master even though the ISDA Master itself contains no financial covenants.
===Cross Aggregation===
===Cross Aggregation===
The [[2002 ISDA Master]] amends the [[1992 ISDA Master]] cross-default provision so that if the outstanding amount under the 2 limbs of cross-default added together breach the {{isdaprov|Threshold Amount|Threshold Amount}}, then that will trigger cross default. Normally, under the 1992 ISDA, cross-default is only triggered if an amount under one or the other limbs is breached.  
The {{2002ma}} updates the {{1992ma}} cross-default provision so that if the outstanding amount under the 2 limbs of cross-default added together breach the {{isdaprov|Threshold Amount|Threshold Amount}}, then that will trigger cross default. Normally, under the {{1992ma}} , cross-default is only triggered if an amount under one or the other limbs is breached.  


As per the above, the two limbs are:
As per the above, the two limbs are:

Navigation menu