82,891
edits
Assignment by way of security: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Not hitherto commonly known as an [[ABWOS]] even though it jolly well ought to be. | Not hitherto commonly known as an [[ABWOS]] even though it jolly well ought to be. | ||
There’s quite a bit more over at [[set-off]] and even more than that at [[netting]], ''and'' some stuff at [[equitable set-off]], too. Unless that’s just a redirect to [[set-off]]. | |||
An [[assignment by way of security]] is an assignment which does not meet all the formal requirements for a [[legal assignment]] set out in the [[Law of Property Act 1925|Law of Property Act]]. So | An [[assignment by way of security]] is an assignment which does not meet all the formal requirements for a [[legal assignment]] set out in the [[Law of Property Act 1925|Law of Property Act]]. So it’s not as good. By definition it is an [[equitable assignment]] and not a [[legal assignment]], the differences relating to how an assignee enforces its claim against contracting party: a legal assignee can sue in its own name; and equitable assignee only by joining the assignor to the action (I know: shoot me, right?) | ||
===Do I need an [[assignment by way of security]] if I have a [[charge]]?=== | ===Do I need an [[assignment by way of security]] if I have a [[charge]]?=== | ||