Non-contractual obligation: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|negotiation|}}From the “shoot me now” file, the idea of a non-contractual obligaiton is relevant to:  
{{a|negotiation|}}From the “shoot me now” file, the idea of a “[[non-contractual obligation]]” is relevant to:  
:(a) the [[terminally pedantic]] and  
:(a) the [[terminally pedantic]] and  
(b) those splendid, if [[terminally pedantic]], folk whose handmaiden is the [[Rome II]] convention on [[governing law]].  
(b) those splendid, if [[terminally pedantic]], folk whose handmaiden is the [[Rome II]] convention on [[governing law]].  


“[[Non-contractual obligations]]” includes claims based on [[tort]] (such as [[negligence]]), breach of [[competition law]] and breach of [[statutory duty]] which may nonetheless arise out of a [[contract]] without amounting to a breach of it. As you can imagine, this happens a lot in the context of financial markets transactions.<ref>It doesn’t.</ref>
“[[Non-contractual obligations]]” includes claims based on [[tort]] (such as [[negligence]]), breach of [[competition law]] and breach of [[statutory duty]] which may nonetheless arise out of a [[contract]] without amounting to a breach of it. As you can imagine, this happens a lot in the context of financial markets transactions.<ref>It doesn’t.</ref>


{{sa}}
{{sa}}
Line 11: Line 9:
*[[Governing law]]
*[[Governing law]]
*[[Non-exclusive jurisdiction]]
*[[Non-exclusive jurisdiction]]
{{ref}}

Navigation menu