Root cause analysis: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 9: Line 9:


===Example===
===Example===
Wikipedia gives the following, somewhat implausible example where the problem is that your vehicle will not start.
Wikipedia gives the following, somewhat implausible example where the problem is that your car won’t start.
*Why won’t my car start? – The battery is dead.  
*Why won’t my car start? – Because the battery is dead.  
*Why is the battery dead? – The alternator doesn’t work.
*Why is the battery dead? – Because the alternator doesn’t work.
*Why won’t the alternator work? — The alternator belt has broken.
*Why won’t the alternator work? — Because the alternator belt has broken.
*Why has the alternator belt broken? – The alternator belt was worn out and not replaced.  
*Why has the alternator belt broken? – Because the alternator belt was worn out and not replaced.  
*Why was the alternator belt not replaced in time? – The vehicle was not maintained according to its recommended service schedule.  
*Why was the alternator belt not replaced in time? – Because you didn’t maintain the car according to its recommended service schedule.  


Thus: the root cause of your problem is that ''you didn’t follow regulations, you naughty little squirrel''. [[Operator error]]; a failure to attend to a [[second-order derivative]] [[process]]. Now if that seems a little implausible to you, you have at least ''me'' for company. And, I think, {{author|Sidney Dekker}}. And {{author|Charles Perrow}}, were he still around. Notice the industry here: to reduce a problem to a ''fundamental breach of a [[process]]'': a [[heuristic]] or algorithm designed to defend against the intractable messiness of the universe, but which treats that universe like a super-complicated game of [[Go]].
Thus: the root cause of your problem is that ''you didn’t follow regulations, you naughty little squirrel''. [[Operator error]]; a failure to attend to a [[second-order derivative]] [[process]]. Now if that seems a little implausible to you, you have at least ''me'' for company. And, I think, {{author|Sidney Dekker}}. And {{author|Charles Perrow}}, were he still around. Notice the industry here: to reduce a problem to a ''fundamental breach of a [[process]]'': a [[heuristic]] or algorithm designed to defend against the intractable messiness of the universe, but which treats that universe like a super-complicated game of [[Go]].

Navigation menu