A World Without Work: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{A|book review|[[File:Dole-queue.jpg|450px|thumb|center|Passtimes of the future, as imagined by {{author|Daniel Susskind}}]]}}
{{A|book review|'''''A World Without Work: Technology, Automation, and How We Should Respond''''' by Daniel Susskind (2020)
'''[https://g.co/kgs/cwgGvE ''A World Without Work: Technology, Automation, and How We Should Respond'']''' by [[Daniel Susskind]] (2020)
 
[[File:Dole-queue.jpg|450px|thumb|center|Passtimes of the future, as imagined by {{author|Daniel Susskind}}]]}}


Dr. Susskind, scion of the storied futurology dynasty, will doubtless find enough [[general counsel]] who are anxious to seem at the technological vanguard — and interested mugs like me, who are suckers for sci-fi alternative histories — at least to recoup his advance, but {{br|A World Without Work}} will not signpost much less dent the  immutable trajectory of modern employment, misunderstanding as it does how humans, organisations or economies work, while ignoring — neigh, ''contradicting'' — the whole history of technology, from the plough. An excellent counterpoint, though equally flawed in other ways, is the late {{author|David Graeber}}’s highly provocative {{Br|Bullshit Jobs: A Theory}}, which has a far more realistic, if no less glum, prognosis: soul-destroying jobs aren’t going away: they are only going to be more and more of them. This feels more plausible to me.
Dr. Susskind, scion of the storied futurology dynasty, will doubtless find enough [[general counsel]] who are anxious to seem at the technological vanguard — and interested mugs like me, who are suckers for sci-fi alternative histories — at least to recoup his advance, but {{br|A World Without Work}} will not signpost much less dent the  immutable trajectory of modern employment, misunderstanding as it does how humans, organisations or economies work, while ignoring — neigh, ''contradicting'' — the whole history of technology, from the plough. An excellent counterpoint, though equally flawed in other ways, is the late {{author|David Graeber}}’s highly provocative {{Br|Bullshit Jobs: A Theory}}, which has a far more realistic, if no less glum, prognosis: soul-destroying jobs aren’t going away: they are only going to be more and more of them. This feels more plausible to me.

Navigation menu