A World Without Work: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{A|book review|'''''A World Without Work: Technology, Automation, and How We Should Respond''''' by Daniel Susskind (2020) <small>Get it [https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/A_World_Without_Work.html? here]</small>
{{A|book review|'''''A World Without Work: Technology, Automation, and How We Should Respond''''' by Daniel Susskind (2020) <small>Get it [https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/A_World_Without_Work.html? here]</small>
[[File:Dole-queue.jpg|450px|thumb|center|Passtimes of the future, as imagined by {{author|Daniel Susskind}}]]}}
[[File:Dole-queue.jpg|450px|thumb|center|Passtimes of the future, as imagined by {{author|Daniel Susskind}}]]}}
Dr. Susskind, scion of the storied futurology dynasty, will doubtless find enough [[general counsel]] who are anxious to seem at the technological vanguard — and interested mugs like me, who are suckers for sci-fi alternative histories — at least to recoup his advance, but {{br|A World Without Work}} will not signpost much less dent the  immutable trajectory of modern employment, misunderstanding as it does how humans, organisations or economies work, while ignoring — neigh, ''contradicting'' — the whole history of technology, from the plough. An excellent counterpoint, though equally flawed in other ways, is the late {{author|David Graeber}}’s highly provocative {{Br|Bullshit Jobs: A Theory}}, which has a far more realistic, if no less glum, prognosis: soul-destroying jobs aren’t going away: they are only going to be more and more of them. This feels more plausible to me.
Dr. Susskind, scion of the storied futurology dynasty, will doubtless find enough [[general counsel]] anxious to be seen at the technological vanguard — and interested mugs like me, who are suckers for sci-fi alternative histories — to recoup his advance, but {{br|A World Without Work}} will not signpost much less dent the  immutable trajectory of modern employment, misunderstanding as it does how humans, organisations or economies work, while ignoring — neigh, ''contradicting'' — the whole history of technology, from the plough. An excellent counterpoint, though equally flawed in other ways, is the late {{author|David Graeber}}’s highly provocative {{Br|Bullshit Jobs: A Theory}}, which has a far more realistic, if no less glum, prognosis: soul-destroying jobs aren’t going away: they are only going to be more and more of them. This feels more plausible to me.


Technology has ''never'' destroyed overall labour, and Susskind gives no good grounds for believing it will suddenly start now.
Technology has ''never'' destroyed overall labour, and Susskind gives no good grounds for believing it will suddenly start now.

Navigation menu