Algorithm: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
76 bytes removed ,  14 December 2020
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|Technology|}}An [[algorithm]] is a process or set of rules to be followed in calculations or other problem-solving operations, especially by a computer, or [[Meatware|non-questioning drone in Bangalore]]. An [[algorithm]]’s success is predicated on all conundrums within its domain having been finally resolved, so it can operate without obstruction or intervention from a guiding intelligent hand.
{{def|Algorithm|/ˈalɡərɪð(ə)m/|n|}}A recipe, process or set of rules to be followed to achieve a pre-determined outcome, especially by a computer, a replicated organism or [[school-leaver in Bucharest]]. An [[algorithm]]’s success depends on all problems within its field of operation having been finally solved, so it can operate without obstruction or intervention from a guiding intelligent hand. Described by {{author|Daniel Dennett}} as a “universal acid”, the concept of the algorithm has certainly burned through ifs fair share of synapses in the [[management consultant|management consulting]] industry. The notion that the ''something'' of rice pudding and income tax might come from the ''nothing'' of primordial sludge, without a beneficent creator, is the basis behind the current dogmas of [[artificial intelligence]], and the belief that ''no'' intelligence, let alone [[subject matter expert]]ise, is needed to manage a [[complex]] process such as running an [[investment bank]].


Compare with a [[heuristic]].
Compare with a [[heuristic]].
Line 8: Line 8:


Also of great interest to [[evolution]]ary biologists, psychiatrists and philosophers: According to {{author|Daniel Dennett}}, the great (if unstated) insight of {{author|Charles Darwin}}’s {{br|The Origin of Species}} was that the evolutionary process was a mindless, algorithmic one, that could operate without intervention. This made him a household name ([[Daniel Dennett|Dennett]], not Darwin) when he published {{br|Darwin’s Dangerous Idea}}.  
Also of great interest to [[evolution]]ary biologists, psychiatrists and philosophers: According to {{author|Daniel Dennett}}, the great (if unstated) insight of {{author|Charles Darwin}}’s {{br|The Origin of Species}} was that the evolutionary process was a mindless, algorithmic one, that could operate without intervention. This made him a household name ([[Daniel Dennett|Dennett]], not Darwin) when he published {{br|Darwin’s Dangerous Idea}}.  
Dennett described it as “universal acid”, and it certainly seems to have burned through a few synapses in the [[management consultant|management consulting]] industry. That piece of [[Magic incantation|magic]]: that the ''something'' of rice pudding and income tax that could come from the ''nothing'' of primordial sludge, without a beneficent creator, is the basis behind the current dogmas of [[artificial intelligence]], and the belief that ''no'' intelligence, let alone [[subject matter expert]]ise, is needed to effectively run a complex process such as (for totally random example) the [[onboarding]] of trading counterparties in an [[investment bank]].


{{sa}}
{{sa}}
Line 19: Line 16:
*[[Substance and form]]
*[[Substance and form]]
*[[Algorithm vs. heuristic]] - machine versus human
*[[Algorithm vs. heuristic]] - machine versus human
{{devil}}

Navigation menu