82,914
edits
Legal code: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Or | Or | ||
<nowiki>{{subject| | <nowiki>{{subject|all}}</nowiki> <nowiki>{{commitment|must}}</nowiki> <nowiki>{{action|pay {{conjunction|or}} deliver}}</nowiki> <nowiki>{{object|obligations in Confirm}}</nowiki> <nowiki>{{condition|per Agreement}}</nowiki> | ||
The point being that “agrees to”, “will”, “shall”, “must”, “is obliged to”, “shall be obligated to”, “shall unconditionally be obligated to” and so on all code back to “<nowiki>{{commitment|must}}</nowiki>”. | The point being that “agrees to”, “will”, “shall”, “must”, “is obliged to”, “shall be obligated to”, “shall unconditionally be obligated to” and so on all code back to “<nowiki>{{commitment|must}}</nowiki>”. | ||
Ideally a lawyer would be able to code from principles. | Ideally a lawyer would be able to code from principles. | ||
I don’t think you would need to describe the complete set. Even if you only had subject, object, commitment it could reduce a lot of crap. | |||
So the question is, is this possible? Is this Bertrand Russell folly? Esperanto? | So the question is, is this possible? Is this Bertrand Russell folly? Esperanto? | ||