Events of Default - GMSLA Provision: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
====OSLA====
====OSLA====


By contrast in the [[Overseas Securities Lenders’ Agreement]],  a failure to deliver was not an {{gmslaprov|Event of Default}}.  Rather, a failure to deliver securities to initiate a loan is not a breach of agreement, and a failure to redeliver securities at the end of a loan allows the lender to buy in securities to cover the fail.
By contrast in the [[Overseas Securities Lenders’ Agreement]],  a failure to deliver in not an {{gmslaprov|Event of Default}}: a failure to deliver securities to {{isdaprov|initiate}} a loan is no breach of agreement, and a failure to redeliver securities at the end of a loan to {{isdaprov|complete}} it allows the lender to [[buy in]] securities to cover the fail.
 
====Failure to deliver Collatera====


Under both the {{gmslaprov|GMSLA}} and the {{gmslaprov|OSLA}}, a failure to deliver collateral is an {{gmslaprov|Event of Default}}.  
Under both the {{gmslaprov|GMSLA}} and the {{gmslaprov|OSLA}}, a failure to deliver collateral is an {{gmslaprov|Event of Default}}.  


Delivery failures are a feature of the market
====Delivery Failures====
 
Delivery failures are a feature of the market: deliveries frequently fail in the stock lending market - a 10% delivery failure rate is not uncommon, and it can be over 50% in emerging markets.  They occur for a number of reasons:
Deliveries frequently fail in the stock lending market - a 10% delivery failure rate is not uncommon, and can be over 50% in emerging markets.  Making delivery failures an Event of Default would put participants in a perpetual state of default. 
 
Delivery failures occur for a number of reasons:
*Operational failure, such as a mismatch of instructions
*Operational failure, such as a mismatch of instructions
*A lender may lose the expected supply for example a custodian may expect to lend but the owner of the securities sells before the loan settles
*A lender may lose its expected supply (for example a custodian may expect to lend but the owner of the securities sells before the loan settles)
*A third party may fail to deliver to the party expecting to deliver under the securities loan
*A third party may fail to deliver to the party expecting to deliver under the securities loan
*Lack of availability of the securities to deliver, say, due to the shares going “special”
*Lack of availability of the securities to deliver, for example, due to the shares going “special”
*Exceptionally, due to lack of funds at the deliverer
*Exceptionally, due to lack of funds at the deliverer
Making delivery failures an {{gmslaprov|Event of Default}} would put participants in a perpetual state of default for reasons not necessarily related to the solvency or creditworthiness of the "failing" counterparty.


====The purpose of {{gmslaprov|Events of Default}}====
====The purpose of {{gmslaprov|Events of Default}}====

Navigation menu